Since practically no one in legacy media is covering the Letitia James show trial in NY before the appeals court, MyrtleBeachSC News is bringing it forward. The Wall Street Journal has put out a video, which we share below.

During the hearing, the NY state’s attorney, Judith Vale, [speaking on behalf of the Trump “supposed” fraud case brought by Letitia James] faced a challenging beginning. Without much opportunity to speak, a judge interjected and inquired about previous instances where the attorney general had filed lawsuits under the state executive law:

Appeals Judges Confront Letitia James court attorneys

!function(r,u,m,b,l,e){r._Rumble=b,r[b]||(r[b]=function(){(r[b]._=r[b]._||[]).push(arguments);if(r[b]._.length==1){l=u.createElement(m),e=u.getElementsByTagName(m)[0],l.async=1,l.src=”https://rumble.com/embedJS/u4xubr”+(arguments[1].video?’.’+arguments[1].video:”)+”/?url=”+encodeURIComponent(location.href)+”&args=”+encodeURIComponent(JSON.stringify([].slice.apply(arguments))),e.parentNode.insertBefore(l,e)}})}(window, document, “script”, “Rumble“); Rumble(“play”, {“video”:”v5fxzt9″,”div”:”rumble_v5fxzt9″});

to upset a private business transaction that was between equally sophisticated partners, where the supposed victim had the ability and legal obligation to discover the allegedly misrepresented matters by conducting its own due diligence; where the supposed wrongdoer advised the supposed victim, through written disclaimers, to conduct its own due diligence and to draw its own conclusions; where the alleged misrepresentation almost entirely concerned inherently subjective valuations of properties and businesses; and where the victim never complained about any fraud.”

The situation did not improve significantly for the state afterwards. Another judge questioned the impact since there was minimal to no effect on the public marketplace. A third judge described the case as a possible disagreement between private parties, implying that it did not require the involvement of the attorney general. Lastly, a fourth judge on the panel expressed concerns about mission creep, highlighting whether the state law had been utilized for purposes beyond its original intent.

It is impossible to determine the exact outcome based on oral arguments alone. However, the attorneys working for Letitia James were begging the Appeals Court not to impose sanctions on Letitia James and co-councils during their closing arguments.

Letitia James Booed by NYC Firefighters

TRUMP DERANGEMENT SYNDROME

!function(r,u,m,b,l,e){r._Rumble=b,r[b]||(r[b]=function(){(r[b]._=r[b]._||[]).push(arguments);if(r[b]._.length==1){l=u.createElement(m),e=u.getElementsByTagName(m)[0],l.async=1,l.src=”https://rumble.com/embedJS/u4xubr”+(arguments[1].video?’.’+arguments[1].video:”)+”/?url=”+encodeURIComponent(location.href)+”&args=”+encodeURIComponent(JSON.stringify([].slice.apply(arguments))),e.parentNode.insertBefore(l,e)}})}(window, document, “script”, “Rumble”); Rumble(“play”, {“video”:”v5fxi7g”,”div”:”rumble_v5fxi7g”});

Anything is possible in the state of New York. Letitia James faced a difficult questioning session, and the outcome will depend on the judges’ ruling.