Shibumi Shade is one of the most popular beach shade accessories among tourists in America. The above picture of Topsail Beach, NC shows just how popular the accessory has become.
Only Surfside Beach in Horry County allows Shibumi Shade accessories all year long, however.
After last night’s vote, the beach equipment popular with tourists is not allowed on the beaches in unincorporated Horry County.
On Tuesday night, an ordinance permitting a one-year trial of wind-driven shading devices, such as those manufactured by Shibumi Shade, on unincorporated county beaches was not approved by the Horry County Council. The city of Myrtle Beach actually lobbied Horry County Council to reject the motion.
Experience the Benefits of Shibumi Shade
Shibumi Shade offers a unique solution for beachgoers looking for comfort and protection from the sun without the bulky and less safe traditional beach umbrellas. With its sleek design and lightweight materials, it has become a favorite among those who frequent the beaches.
This year-round allowance makes Surfside Beach a more attractive option for tourists. Unlike other beaches, where portable shades may be restricted, visitors here can comfortably set up their Shibumi Shades without fear of being told to remove them.
This decision has sparked disappointment among many, as these shading devices have grown in popularity due to their practicality and aesthetic appeal. Tourists want a safe and enjoyable beach experience, and many believe that Shibumi Shades enhance that experience.
The rejection of this ordinance not only affects the visitors looking for comfort but also the local economy. Many beachgoers spend money on rentals and other beach-related activities, which can boost local businesses.
Just 3 years ago, Myrtle Beach had 20 million tourists. However, the number has dropped to 17.5 million as visitors are choosing different destinations.
These debates are essential for understanding personal freedom on the beach. Supporters of Shibumi Shades argue that they provide a safe alternative to traditional umbrellas, which can become dangerous projectiles in windy conditions.
This perspective is gaining traction among those who frequent the beach, as they feel their needs are being overlooked in favor of vendor interests. Many tourists appreciate the safety features of Shibumi Shades and prefer them over traditional options.
It’s important to note that the shift in tourist preferences is not only about the equipment but also the overall experience. Tourists are increasingly seeking locations that prioritize their comfort and leisure, and this is reflected in their choice of beaches.
These beach towns offer a laid-back atmosphere often missing in larger tourist destinations, leading to longer stays and increased spending. Families and couples looking for a peaceful retreat are especially drawn to these areas.
Such endorsements from experts further solidify the case for allowing Shibumi Shades. Their absence from many beaches is puzzling to tourists who expect to enjoy such innovations in beach equipment.
The safety record of Shibumi Shades underscores the need for a reevaluation of policies that restrict their use. The tragic incident mentioned highlights the need for safer alternatives at the beach.
With their lightweight design, these shades can easily be set up and taken down, making them an ideal choice for families and individuals alike who want a hassle-free day at the beach.
The support for the trial period illustrates that there is a demand for such devices among beachgoers. Many residents and visitors alike see the potential benefits of allowing these shading options.
This anecdotal evidence is critical in shaping public opinion and council decisions. Personal stories from beachgoers can have a significant impact on how these devices are perceived.
Despite these concerns, the actual data suggests that such incidents are rare. This information can help alleviate fears related to the use of shading devices like Shibumi Shades.
Such statements highlight the importance of ensuring that safety measures do not inhibit personal enjoyment at the beach. Council members must weigh the potential risks and rewards carefully.
Tourists are often anxious about safety, especially when children are involved. Awareness and education on the safe use of beach equipment can further mitigate these concerns.
Such sentiments are echoed by many who believe that beachgoers deserve options that enhance their experience. The dialogue surrounding beach equipment is not just about safety but also about providing enjoyable experiences.
During the off-peak months, allowing these devices can also serve to attract visitors, making beaches more appealing during quieter times. This could lead to a more stable tourism economy throughout the year.
However, there were numerous debates both supporting and opposing these devices.
“It’s crucial to prevent any obstructions that could impact general safety for first responders and beach patrons,” said a representative from Beach Services Ltd. Beach Services Ltd is a constituent vendor, however. Tourists have come to believe that the City of Myrtle Beach, North Myrtle Beach, and Horry County are putting the desires of vendors ahead of the wishes of tourists.
While the City of Myrtle Beach may have a monopoly on beach umbrella rentals, the city does not have a monopoly on tourist destinations. Increasingly, tourists are choosing Surfside Beach and NC beach towns above the city of Myrtle Beach.
NC coastal destinations such as Oak Island and Surfside Beach in South Carolina are drawing high-quality visitors who spend more per night and opt for week-long stays. Myrtle Beach is fortunate to secure bookings for stays lasting three nights.
“[The devices] are allowed on hundreds of U.S. beaches with full support from public safety officials and zero safety incidents,” said Dane Barnes, co-founder of Shibumi Shade.
Shibumi Shade has a superior safety rating compared to the umbrellas used in Myrtle Beach. Recently, a beach visitor in the area was fatally injured by a vendor umbrella.
Shibumi Shade spokespeople have stated to local media that their shades provide improved visibility at beaches and are much lighter than standard umbrellas, reducing the risk of danger in case of strong winds pulling them out.
A one-year trial received backing from several council members.
“We have anecdotal evidence that not a single claim has been made for personal injury or wrongful death as a result of a wind-driven device. We know firsthand that there have been issues concerning beach umbrellas,” said councilmember Dennis DiSabato. “To me, we’re talking about a trial period, there’s nothing here set in stone that says this is going to be something that we deal with in perpetuity.”
Other council members raised concerns regarding reduced visibility and higher noise levels affecting beach safety. These concerns were deemed unsubstantiated due to the minimal presence of lifeguards along the unincorporated area from Springmaid Resort to Long Bay estates, where few beach lifeguards are observed.
“When a lifeguard or somebody can’t hear a child hollering for help that they’re drowning, or a parent can’t get to their child, who’s going to apologize for that death?” said councilmember Michael Masciarelli.
Data indicates that drownings are not a common event in towns across North Carolina. However, drownings happen more often on the beach within the city boundaries of Myrtle Beach.
“Horry County Council decided to bury its head in the sand and not give constituents that freedom,” said Barnes. “Horry County residents deserve better.”
Wind-driven shading devices are prohibited on unincorporated county beaches; however, during the off-season months, both Myrtle Beach and North Myrtle Beach permit their use.