72.1 F
Myrtle Beach
Saturday, October 5, 2024
NewsDivorce documents forged. Judge Holmes omissions cost millions says victim

Divorce documents forged. Judge Holmes omissions cost millions says victim

Horry County Senator Luke Rankin’s JMSC ruled that Judge Jan Bromell Holmes was qualified for an upgrade to the S.C. Court of Appeals a few weeks past.

Afterwards, Linda Stancek sent us the following series of foundation on what she called a nightmare working with Horry County Attorneys, S.C. Attorney General Alan Wilson, SLED, Horry County Police, and Judge Holmes navigating a forged divorce document that personally cost her millions.

Below is a narrative in Stancek’s own words about the errors and omissions by Judge Holmes and what Stancek calls a “cover up” locally all the way to the state level.

STANCEK’S TESTIMONY IN HER OWN WORDS

On June 8, 2009, I had a final divorce hearing with my ex, Jackson Moore.

Judge Jan Brommell-Holmes presided over this hearing.  Attorney James Purvis was my attorney.  I was never impressed by Purvis and never thought he had my best interest at heart, but I just thought at that time he was only very stupid.  Attorney N David DuRant was his partner, whom I have never met.

Ryan Stampfle was my ex, Jackson Moore’s attorney.

Ryan Stamfle Indigo Law Firm
Ryan Stamfle Indigo Law Firm says “Damn it feels good to be a gansta”

During this hearing, Judge Holmes never addressed me.  She never asked me a question nor did she ask me to verify my signature on the divorce document. Attorney Ryan Stampfle handed that into Judge Holmes in her court.

Prior to said hearing, I  signed an agreement in Purvis’s office.  He was not there.  Two women office workers were.  I asked to speak to Attorney David DuRant and was told he was not there.  My signature, on the document, I signed that day was not notarized.  I asked for a copy but they couldn’t give me one because they said, their copier was broken.  I kept asking Purvis for a copy, but I never received one.

In Oct 2017, I went to the Horry County courthouse and received a copy of my divorce document.

The document I received was not the agreement I agreed to nor was it the agreement I signed.

The courthouse document also shows the forged signature was notarized by Attorney N David DuRant.  To reiterate, I have never met the man.  Two women were witnesses to this forgery.

I then went to the Horry County Police Department and filed a police report.  It was obvious from the start they never wanted to  investigate.  Officer Hassett assisted me.  After explaining to him why I was there, his first response was “we don’t investigate forgeries.”  I told him that was not true and I insisted I wanted to file a report and he grudgingly agreed.  At the end he had me sign a “Victim’s” form.  I asked for a copy but he didn’t give me one.

They never did “investigate”, but pretended to for several years.

I worked with several Horry County Police officers, specifically Lieutenant Jamie DeBari and Chief Joe Hill.

During the investigation I obtained three separate-hand writing experts’ analysis all verifying my signature was forged.  Two of those were done by SLED and another was done by one of the leading hand-writing experts in America.

Still, after receiving these analysis’s Lt. DeBari never arrested anyone and actually closed my file in Aug 2018 stating “not sufficient probable cause for criminal charges.”

During this investigation I also worked with SLED to investigate the forgery and HCPD for corruption.  At that time the HCPD had been sued hundreds of times for non-investigations.

SLED also “pretended” to investigate.  I worked specifically with SLED Assistant Chief Paul Grant, Major Richard Gregory and Captain Abraham.  Although I never spoke with SLED Chief Mark Keel. However, I sent him many emails.

During this time I also sent Judge Holmes several emails explaining to her the situation she created  by not asking me a single question in court and by not showing me the document Attorney Ryan Stampfle handed her in court to verify my signature.  Because of this, Holmes cost me millions of dollars.  I also sent Judge Holmes the confirmation of the three separate hand-writing experts analysis’s all verifying a forgery.  She responded by saying she was not allowed to discuss any case outside of the courtroom.

I found out later during a final divorce hearing, the Judge ALWAYS asks each party specific questions and ALWAYS has each party verify their signature.

Of course, that makes perfect sense.  At the time of the hearing I knew something was off. It didn’t feel right, but I didn’t know what.  However, I was also dealing with a double murder in my family.  My sister and father were stabbed to death in Las Vegas and a trial was beginning.  

I was flying back and forth from Myrtle Beach to Las Vegas and dealing with my divorce.  

In May 2019, I contacted the S.C. Inspector General Jeffrey Lamkin for help.  I found Mr. Lamkin to be very ethical and professional,… a lovely man.  

On May 28, 2019 Mr. Lamkin sent both the SC AG Alan Wilson and SLED’s Mark Keel a letter directing them to investigate my forgery claim.  He attached complete documents regarding the forgery including the three hand-writing analysis’s and Horry County Police Department Lieutenant Jamie DeBari’s denial letter closing my file.

EXPERT ANALISYS – Signature is forged. Exhibit A

He sent a copy to Chief Hill directly.

I talked to Hill the day after he received Mr. Lamkin’s letter.  He told me he was, at that time, issuing arrest warrants for all involved.

In June 2019 Paul Grant of SLED and Judge Jeff Young of the SC AG both responded to Mr. Lamkin in writing stating “there is not sufficient probable cause for criminal charges.”

Shortly after that Hill stopped investigating again.

At that point it was crystal clear how deep the cover up and corruption in protecting Judge Holmes was.

Judge Holmes had destroyed my life.  The money she allowed to be stolen from me is life changing…  Millions of dollars.  What she did to me was truly evil.

I believe A LOT money changed hands between my ex and Judge Holmes, Ryan Stampfle, James Purvis and David DuRant.

I want to be a voice for area families and I urge any person who has been before Judge Holmes, who has even just a hint of suspicion, that something didn’t feel right. Something was off. Act on that suspicion.  Especially if Attorney Ryan Stampfle, Purvis or Attorney David DuRant were involved.  Don’t be silent.  Come forward. Start asking questions and demand answers and check your documents filed at the courthouse to make sure they are correct.  My advise is not to assume anything.

Due to a family emergency, I left S.C. in 2020 and couldn’t seriously pursue this again until now.

While researching my case, I read several articles on attorneys who have successfully sued SLED and came across attorney Marvin Pendarvis.

I actually called him about my case.  He seemed very interested until he asked who the Judge was.  When I notified him it was Judge Holmes, response was an immediate (something to the effect of) he wouldn’t be able to help me.  That made me suspicious until I read articles about his alleged connection to ballot swapping.

———- Email message To Judge Holmes ———
From: Linda Moore <>
Date: Wed, May 29, 2019, 1:38 PM
Subject:
To: <@sccourts.org>, oig, <.sc.gov>

Judge Holmes,

In explaining my situation to certain people  their first question is always “Didn’t the Judge ask you to verify your signature on the  document Exhibit A?   If you had only asked me that, this forgery would have been stopped the moment I saw the signature.  ITS Clearly a forgery.  They actually misspelled my last name.
You have no ideal how I’ve suffered because of not getting that opportunity to ” verify” the forgery THAT DAY.

I understand, these steps are actually suppose to protect the Judges interest.

My answer is always no and that I was never asked a single question by you.

I now understand the full meaning of that question.  I, also understand,  its standard courtroom behavior, for the Judge to ask each party regarding their acceptance of said divorce agreement by asking multiple questions. One of them is to VERIFY their signature(s).

The very first thing that happened in the your courtroom that morning, Attorney Ryan Stanpfle (the ex’s attorney) walked up to you and handed you the fraudulent, forged Exhibit A document, which you  accepted immediately. Without a question to anyone, stated you accepted it.  You spoke privately for many minutes with Stampfle.

This fake document was never shown to my side that day, nor Judge, did you ask me a single question.  I was never put under oath.

Had I had the opportunity to see the FORGED signature, I would have not had these many frauds perpetrated  on me, for 10 years.  I cannot describe the horror I’ve been made to live thru trying to get justice done for this hell I’ve been made to endure.

That forged document has cost me life changing money.  That means lots and lots of it.  This has affected my life tremdiously.

I very much want all that has been stolen from me, by these attorneys criminal actions.  I have, in hand, positive verifications from 2 different experts. 

You received the PDF from Curt B, verifying it’s a forgery.

I also have a positive result, for same Exhibit A forgery, from SLED.  Lt Debari received SLED’s positive yourselfanalysis, you may be aware, in April 2018.

My question, regarding the courts behavior in our final divorce hearing. 

Can you explain why my case seems to have been handled so far contrary to what I’ve been led to believe is most common, here, in MB.

Please explain first, why no questions?

FYI,  I tried many times to get a copy of that court transcript.  I tried, at least 5 different times by writing to the transcriber, along with a check for her fee.   Never received a transcript and not one letter ever returned.  She never cashed a check.

Now, I’ve been informed by the experts,  its impossible to get a copy.   Any copy of any court transcript, is destroyed after 5 years.

However, also FYI, I’ve heard rumors that the HCPD was able to obtain one.

I’ve never seen this transcript.

However, Captain Abraham of SLED, read me a portion of this same transcript he said he received from the HCPD.

I IMMEDIATELY told him that what he read to me never happened. It was lies.

Do you also need all parties together, before discussing this issue with me.

I understand you have the authority to set up this crucial meeting, with all parties.

If so, I request, again, you do that.

Regards.  

SLED IS NOTIFIED ALONG WITH S.C. A.G.

Forged Document Notificatio… by MyrtleBeachSC news

________________

———- FOLLOW UP EMAIL TO JUDGE HOLMES ———
From:ย Linda Mooreย <@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, May 24, 2019, 12:11 PM
Subject: Fwd: [External] Fwd: To Linda Moore / Your Updated Notarized Expert Opinion Letter from the Office of Curt Baggett
To: <@sccourts.org>
Cc: oig, <.sc.gov>

Judge Bromell-Holmes,

You may remember my contacting you last year regarding fraud prepetrated upon your court.

Attached is confirmation from one of the leading hand writing experts in the country, verifying my signature is a forgery for Exhibit A of my court documents you approved.  Although you did not initial the document, as you did your Final Hearing.

Obviously, Exhibit A should be invalidated.

You had mentioned, I believe, all parties need to be present in order for you to discuss.

Please advise how you would like to proceed.

Linda Moore

_________________________________________________________

Bagget’s Credentials: Expert Signature Analyst

CURT BAGGETT

Expert Document Examiner

533 Park Lane, Richardson, TX  75081

Phone: 972.644.0285 

[email protected]

 www.ExpertDocumentExaminer.com

Curt Baggett is a leading handwriting expert in the United States. He is also a skilled authority in document examination and as an expert witness and he has completed over 6.000 cases. Mr. Baggett has examined documents and/or testified in court cases as a handwriting expert in all 50 states, Washington, D.C., the Bahamas, Brazil, Canada, Chile, England, Ireland, Mexico, Pakistan, Puerto Rico, Thailand and New Zealand, Korea, China, Australia and Denmark.   

The U.S. Department of Justice, the State of Arizona, State of Arkansas, the State of California, Louisiana Public Defender Board, and the State of Texas have retained him. Mr. Baggett has appeared as a handwriting expert on WOLF-BLITZER-CNN; CHARLES GIBSON-ABC, INSIDE EDITION, CBS Network Radio, CBS, CNBC, CNN, FOX, JUDGE ALEX, TEXAS JUSTICE and GOOD MORNING TEXAS and was a consultant as a forensic document examiner for a number one television show, โ€œCSI: Crime Scene Investigationโ€.  Mr. Baggett is the co-author of โ€œThe Handwriting Certification Home Study Courseโ€ and โ€œHow To Spot a Forgeryโ€ and has been a guest on various other television and radio programs discussing handwriting and forensic document examination.

Mr. Baggett once held the position as Dean of the School of Forensic Document Examination at Handwriting University.  In addition to lecturing and teaching document examination, Mr. Baggett has analyzed handwriting for over 40 years.  He has been qualified as an expert witness in Justice of the Peace, Municipal, District, State, U.S. District, and Federal Bankruptcy Courts, Eastern Caribbean Supreme Court, High Court of Tynwald British Isles and the Provincial Courts of Canada.

His education and training in document examination and psychology include: U.S. Army, Military Police Officerโ€™s School; B.A. and M.Ed., McNeese State University, Lake Charles, Louisiana; and post-graduate studies at the University of Houston, Houston, Texas.

Curt Baggettโ€™s library is extensive and includes literature on questioned document examination, forensic handwriting analysis, behavior profiling, and statement analysis.

Laboratory equipment used for examination consists of a Stereo Star Zoom American Optical 7x โ€“ 30x twin microscope; Micronta illuminated 30x microscope; stereo microscope S/ST series; universal DigiScoping adapter; numerous magnifying devices; protractor and metric measuring devices; Pentax ME camera; Pentax macro 1.4, 50mm flat copy lens; overhead projector; light table, and transparencies.

Curt Baggettโ€™s Education and Training in Handwriting and Document Examination Include:

An in person two-year apprenticeship with Dr. Ray Walker as a handwriting expert and questioned document examiner.  Dr. Walkerโ€™s qualifications have been affirmed in the Court of Appeals, Fifth District of Texas at Dallas, and had historical rulings in his favor.  A leading authority in the field of handwriting analysis and document examination, Dr. Walker is the author of The Questioned Document Examiner and the Justice System.

The American Bureau of Document Examiners certifies Mr. Baggett.  He also has a certificate of completion from the American Institute of Applied Science.  

Lectures, Conferences, and Classes Attended:

2004 School of Forensic Document Examinationโ€™s Annual Conference, Dallas, Texas

Attended classes taught by Reed Hayes, QDE, Katherine Koppenhaver, QDE, Bill Koppenhaver, QDE

2004 School of Forensic Document Examinationโ€™s Teleclass Curriculum

Examination of Anonymous Writing by Reed Hayes, QDE

Document Examination Terminology by Don Lehew, QDE

Notary Public by Don Lehew, QDE

Advanced Forgery Identification by Don Lehew, QDE

Instructor 

2005 School of Forensic Document Examinationโ€™s Annual Conference, Dallas, Texas

Attended the following lectures, in addition to general sessions:

Tremors and line Quality taught by Reed Hayes, QDE

Demonstrative Evidence taught by Katherine Koppenhaver, QDE, Bill Koppenhaver, QDE

Photography through microscopes by David Babb, QDE

Paper and Watermarks by John McGuire, QDE

Lecturer

2005 School of Forensic Document Examinationโ€™s Teleclasses 

Natural Variation taught by Reed Hayes, QDE

The Discrimination of Handwriting by Don Lehew, QDE

Procedures for Examining Signatures by Don Lehew, QDE

Courtroom Procedures and Roles by Don Lehew, QDE

Instructor

2006 School of Forensic Document Examinationโ€™s Annual Conference, Dallas, Texas

Attended the following lectures, in addition to general sessions:

Deposition and Cross Examinations by Dr. Richard Frazier, QDE

Medical Problems Affecting handwriting by Dr. Richard Frazier, QDE

Legal Issues for Document Examiners by Dr. Richard Frazier, QDE

Deposition and Cross Examinations by Dr. Richard Frazier, QDE

Health Factors Affecting Handwriting by Dr. Joe Alexander, QDE

Prescription Forgery and Medical Crimes by Diane King,  Lecturer

2007 Handwriting University Annual Conference, Dallas, Texas

Trainer and Instructor

2007 School of Forensic Document Examinationโ€™s Teleclasses 

Instructor – Handwriting Basics and Exemplars

Instructor – Multiple Classes on Case Studies and Examinations

2008 Handwriting University Annual Conference, Las Vegas, Nevada 

Trainer and Instructor 

2009 School of Forensic Document Examinationโ€™s Live Teleclasses

Attended a variety of classes taught by Robert Baier, QDE, Police Instructor

2009 Handwriting University Annual Conference, Las Vegas, Nevada

Critical Incident Stress:  Statement Analysis and Interview v. Interrogation by Faith Wood

Forensic Document Examination Application by Robert Baier, QDE, Police Instructor

Trainer and Instructor for Introduction to Forensic Document Examination

2010 Handwriting University Annual Conference, Las Vegas, Nevada

Advanced Statement Analysis by Faith Wood

Identity Theft and Prevention by Robert Baier, QDE, Police Instructor

Trainer and Instructor for Introduction to Forensic Document Examination

2010 Speaker โ€“ โ€œIntroduction to the Science of Handwriting and Forensic Document Examinationโ€, Clear Lake High School

2011 Lecturer and Instructor, โ€œHow to Spot a Forgeryโ€, Denver Elections Division, Denver, Colorado

2012 Lecturer and Instructor, โ€œHow to Spot a Forgeryโ€, Denver Elections Division, Denver, Colorado

2012 Speaker โ€“ โ€œHow to Avoid a Forgeryโ€, Military Order of Purple Hearts Annual Meeting, Dallas, Texas

2013 Speaker โ€“ โ€œIntroduction to the Science of Handwriting and Forensic Document Examinationโ€; Appointment as Guest Lecturer and Consultant by Stefanie Page, Instructor, Forensic Science Department, Jesuit College Preparatory School of Dallas

2013 Speaker โ€“ โ€œIntroduction to the Science of Handwriting and Forensic Document Examinationโ€, Irma 

             Lerma Rangel Young Womenโ€™s Leadership School, Dallas, Texas

2016 Speaker โ€“ Handwriting University International Handwriting Conference in Las Vegas, NV (Sept.)

2018 Instructor via written presentation at the 18th Wroclaw Symposium of Questioned Document 

             Examination at University of Wroclaw in Poland June 6-8, 2018

Past and Present Memberships

American College of Forensic Examiners International

American Legion

Center of Forensic Profiling 

Forensic Expert Witness Association

IMS Expert Services

Military Order of World Wars

National Questioned Document Association

Sheriffโ€™s Association of Texas

Texas Police Association 

Veterans of Foreign Wars

World Federation of Handwriting Experts

National Association of Distinguished Professionals 

SEAK-Expert Witness Resources

Published Articles and Books

Ethics for Experts

Handwriting Certification Course

How to Help Attorneys With Your Case

How to Spot a Forgery

Taking the Witness Stand

______________________

EMAIL TO HCPD POLICE CHIEF JOE HILL

———- Forwarded message ———
From: Linda Moore <@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, Aug 24, 2019, 2:17 PM
Subject:
To: Hill, Joseph <@horrycounty.org>

Dear Chief Joe Hill,

I’m following up again on this issue. I know I’m legally entitled to the HONEST answer from you on this.  Not that that argument has ever worked in getting any type of a response from you.

I’m a forever optimist it appears.

After you received the IG’s, Mr Lamkin, letter asking you to investigate my police case, you actually, for the first time in almost 2 years, started a REAL investingation, correct?  

You convinced me you had by all the information you gave me.  That had never happened before.  You giving me ANY information, AT ALL, on my case.  I was elated.

I had no doubt, receiving a letter from the IG personally, you would absolutely do as he requested.  

Then, we spoke after you received communication from the AG’s Mr Young telling you of his “conclusion” for some mysterous event, that showed no wrongdoing.  

No one knows for certain which crime, or alledged crime specifically  Young refers too.  There wereany.  That Includes you.  There were many specific issues in the IG’s request letters.  Young gives no specifics on what he talks about or WHAT he really means, ever

No specifics ever given for which issues he decided no wrong doing on.  Like, he NEVER said Attorney Norwood DuRant did “no wrong doing” when he notarized the FORGERY.  YET, he hasn’t been arrested yet.  I had a long talk with the experts from the Notary Organization.  That charge is HUGH if convicted, as you know.  They are waiting for your office to give them that information before they can take appropriate action again Attorney DuRant.  They only take it from law officials.

If you haven’t contacted their office, please do ASAP.

You stated based on his “conclusion of no wrong doing” you closed my file.  Again.

Joe, have I not proven to you I completely destroyed that “conclusion” ?  It was meaningless and ridiculous.  It proved nothing….

JOE, EVERYONE KNOWS THAT.  

I understand pretending like you don’t know anything.   I personally  never go that low.   But I understand those who do.  Don’t you?

Do you agree there was no wrongdoing?  You don’t feel a forgery, with 3 seperate positive results from experts including one of the countrys leading hand writing experts, verifying my signature was forged in the total montarily agreement Exhibit in my divorce file at the Courthouse, is a crime?  That forged, fraudulent paper has cost me millions, which I want.

Do you remember actually telling me the first time we spoke, that you don’t investigate forgeries? I have my follow up email to you with all the details of what you said to me on the phone.  You never responded.  I can send you another if you need for your records 

Do you agree there was absolutely no wrongdoing?

I deserve that very telling answer. I’m thinking your not going to answer.

Please prove me wrong.

You, Completely understanding their “conclusion” was based on untrue statements, you closed my file.  

Why?

Please advise whose decision it was for you to close my file?  Yours?  Mr Young’s?  

Were you ordered to close your investingation?  If yes, by whom?

Also, you received copies of documents already in my police report that proves your Lt DeBari closed my file AFTER receiving 2 positive results from SLED, for same forgery Mr Baggett analyzed.

I have his letter in writing.  Also signed by Chief Deputy Davis.

Very serious crime by law enforcement.  Misconduct in Office?  Is that phrase correct?  I understand that phrase appears to cover a monopoly of their crimes.

And the PROOF IS IN BLACK AND WHITE IN MY POLICE FILE you have, at your office, in Conway, SC.

Regards

SLED REFUSES TO OPEN CASE

Sled Closes Case by MyrtleBeachSC news

Subscribe Today

GET EXCLUSIVE FULL ACCESS TO PREMIUM CONTENT

SUPPORT NONPROFIT JOURNALISM

EXPERT ANALYSIS OF AND EMERGING TRENDS IN CHILD WELFARE AND JUVENILE JUSTICE

TOPICAL VIDEO WEBINARS

Get unlimited access to our EXCLUSIVE Content and our archive of subscriber stories.

Exclusive content

Latest article

More article